Skip to content
Off the Leash

Food & Nutrition

How to actually read a dog food label

The five things worth checking, and the claims that mean nothing.

Off the Leash editorial team · 7 min read

Ignore the front of the bag, because it is advertising. Turn it over and read four things: the composition list (ingredients in descending order by weight), named meats with a percentage, the analytical constituents converted to dry matter, and whether it says "complete" or "complementary". Add the 4% / 14% / 26% naming rules and you can judge almost any food in about thirty seconds.

A bag of dog food is really two documents in one. The front is an advertisement, written by a marketing team. The back is a legal declaration, governed by pet food labelling rules. The good news: almost everything you actually need is on the back. Once you know the handful of things to look for, a label takes about thirty seconds to read.

Front of the bag is marketing, so turn it over

The front exists to sell: a glistening hero shot of meat and vegetables, words like “premium”, “natural” and “holistic”, and a breed or life-stage badge. None of that is closely regulated, and a photo of a chicken breast tells you nothing about how much chicken is in the recipe.

The information that is controlled sits on the back or side, in small print under headings such as Composition, Analytical Constituents, Additives and Feeding Guide. Train yourself to flip the bag first and treat the front as a billboard you can safely ignore.

Read the composition list in order

The Composition, which is the ingredients list, must run in descending order by weight, measured at the point the recipe is mixed. The first two or three ingredients make up the bulk of the food, so that’s where your attention belongs. Two things distort the order.

First, water. Fresh meat is roughly 70 to 75% water, so a recipe can list “fresh chicken” first and still contain less actual chicken than a food that lists a dried “chicken meal” lower down. Once the water cooks off, that fresh chicken shrinks dramatically. Second, ingredient splitting: a maker can divide one ingredient into several entries, such as rice, rice flour and rice bran, so each appears further down the list while meat floats to the top. Add those rice fractions back together and the grain may well outweigh the meat, which is worth knowing before you decide whether grain matters for your dog. Read the whole list, not just the first word.

Named meat beats “meat and animal derivatives”

Composition can be written two ways: by specific ingredient (“chicken”, “salmon”, “brown rice”) or by category (“meat and animal derivatives”, “cereals”, “derivatives of vegetable origin”, “various sugars”). Category terms are legal, but they’re vague by design. “Meat and animal derivatives” can cover a changing mix of animal parts from more than one species, and the recipe may vary batch to batch.

A named ingredient with a percentage (“chicken 26%”) is the gold standard for transparency. Look, too, at whether that percentage refers to fresh or dried meat, and be wary of an open-ended phrase like “with vegetables” that never says which, or how much. For the longer version of that, the meat figure on the front is rarely the number it looks like.

Decode the percentages

Pet food rules set thresholds for how prominently an ingredient can be named, and they’re worth memorising:

  • "Chicken flavour": less than 4%. The food is merely flavoured; there may be almost no chicken in it.
  • "With chicken": at least 4%.
  • "Rich in chicken" / "high in chicken": at least 14%.
  • "Chicken dinner / recipe / menu", or chicken as the headline: at least 26%.

So a “Salmon Dinner” must be at least a quarter salmon, while “with salmon” guarantees only a twentieth. Same fish on the front; very different recipes inside.

Analytical constituents, and the dry-matter trick

The Analytical Constituents box (sometimes “typical analysis”) lists the nutrient percentages: crude protein, crude fat, crude fibre, crude ash and moisture. “Crude” just means measured in the lab, not low quality. “Crude ash”, also called inorganic matter, is the mineral content rather than literal ash, and a figure under about 8% on a dry basis is reasonable.

The catch is moisture. Wet food is around 75 to 80% water while dry food is around 8%, so you cannot compare their protein figures directly. To compare like with like, convert to dry matter: divide the nutrient by (100 minus moisture) and multiply by 100. A wet food showing 10% protein at 80% moisture is actually 50% protein on a dry-matter basis, far higher than the as-fed figure suggests. Always strip out the water before judging. If it is the formats themselves you are weighing up, our guide to dry, wet or raw does that for you.

Check the additives, not just the ingredients

Below the analysis sits the Additives panel, and it deserves a glance. Additives fall into groups. Nutritional additives are the added vitamins and trace elements, such as vitamin D3, vitamin E, zinc and copper. Technological additives include the preservatives and antioxidants that stop fats turning rancid. Sensory additives cover colourants and flavourings.

The thing to watch is how they’re declared. A label may simply say “EC permitted additives” or “with antioxidants” without naming them. Preservatives are the usual case where this matters. Look for named, naturally sourced antioxidants such as tocopherols (vitamin E) or rosemary extract, rather than undeclared ones. Colourings add nothing nutritionally; they’re there for the human buyer, not the dog.

The one word that matters: complete or complementary

If you read nothing else, read this. By law every food is labelled either complete or complementary. A complete food is formulated to be the only thing your dog needs, supplying all required nutrients in the right balance (in the UK and Europe, to FEDIAF guidelines). A complementary food, which covers many toppers, mixers, treats and some raw “nuggets”, is not nutritionally complete and must be fed alongside something else, or your dog will, over time, miss nutrients. The words are small and easy to skip, but they decide whether a food can be the main meal at all. Check the life-stage line beside it, too: “complete for adult dogs” is not the same as “complete for all life stages”, and a puppy needs the latter (or a dedicated puppy food). If your puppy will grow into a big dog, large breed puppy food holds calcium and energy in check too.

Don’t skip the feeding guide

The panel of grams-per-day by bodyweight is a starting point, not a prescription. It is usually set on the generous side, and an active working dog and a snoozy older one of the same weight have very different needs. Feed to your dog’s body condition (you should be able to feel the ribs without pressing, and see a waist from above), and adjust from there. Our guide to portions and body condition shows you how. While you’re on the back of the bag, two more lines earn a look. The best-before date and batch number both help if there is ever a recall, and the net weight tells you how many days a bag covers once you know your dog’s daily portion. The calorie calculator will help you work that out. A tiny dog shows a slightly heavy hand quickly, which is why feeding a toy or small breed gets its own maths.

Claims with no legal meaning

Plenty of front-of-bag language sounds reassuring and means little. “Premium” and “super-premium” have no legal definition. “Natural” is loosely used and rarely verified. “Human-grade” has no agreed meaning in UK pet food. “No fillers” is marketing, because “filler” isn’t a defined term and grains aren’t automatically bad. “Holistic”, “gourmet” and “vet recommended” are sales words, not standards. Judge the food on its composition, percentages and the complete/complementary line, not on adjectives.

A thirty-second label check

  • Turn the bag over and find the Composition first.
  • Check the first three ingredients and add up any split grains.
  • Prefer named meats with a percentage over "meat and animal derivatives".
  • Match the front-of-bag wording to the 4% / 14% / 26% rules.
  • Convert wet and dry to dry matter before comparing nutrients.
  • Confirm it says complete, not complementary, if it's the main meal.
  • Ignore "premium", "natural", "human-grade" and "no fillers".

Frequently asked questions

Is grain-free actually better for my dog?

Not inherently. Unless your dog has a diagnosed grain intolerance, which is uncommon, grains such as rice and oats are a perfectly digestible source of energy. "Grain-free" is a marketing position as much as a nutritional one. The carbohydrate is usually just swapped for potato or pea. Choose on how your dog responds, not on the badge.

Does the order of ingredients tell me the quality?

It tells you the proportions by weight, not the quality. A food can list meat first and still lean on a vague category term, or use ingredient splitting to flatter the order. Read the order alongside the named ingredients and percentages, and treat the first two or three entries as the ones that matter.

What's the difference between "chicken meal" and "fresh chicken"?

Mostly water. Fresh chicken is roughly three-quarters water, which cooks off during manufacture. Chicken meal is already dried and rendered, so it is a far more concentrated source of protein by weight. Neither is automatically better, but it is why a food listing "meal" can deliver more actual meat than one that leads with "fresh".

Are "natural" antioxidants and preservatives worth looking for?

If you are trying to avoid artificial preservatives, yes, though the answer is in the additives panel and not on the front. Naturally sourced options such as tocopherols (vitamin E) and rosemary extract do the same job of keeping fats fresh. The catch is that a label can legally lump these under a generic phrase like "EC permitted antioxidants", so a food that names its preservatives is being more transparent than one that does not.

Sources

General guidance for UK owners, not veterinary advice. If your dog has a specific health condition, check with your vet.

Last updated 2026-08-24.